Diamond Head DU-150 Soprano - REVIEW

1 Jul 2017

Diamond Head DU-150 Soprano - REVIEW

Soprano time again on Got A Ukulele and another brand that takes it's first steps on the reviews page in the form of the Diamond Head DU-150 Soprano.

Diamond Head DU-150 Soprano Ukulele

To be honest with you, I have known about Diamond Head ukuleles for quite some time, but thought they were only available in the USA. So, when I was surprised to see them for sale in the UK, I grabbed one to take a look. Clearly, this is very much a beginner / entry level soprano uke, made in China, so it will come as no surprise that this review finds me drawing many comparisons to last weeks woeful Ashton ukulele review - it's the same 'sort' of price, same sort of construction, will it have the same fatal issues that let the Ashton down so badly?

In this ukulele we've got a standard double bout shaped soprano instrument finished in a paint coating with a satin finish. The colour of this one is clearly dull brown (I call it 'creosote brown' as it is about as inspiring as the fence in my garden..) but these are also available in a range of gaudy colours. It's got one or two blotches in it which don't seem to be flaws as such, rather changes in colour of the paint itself, but I must say - on the whole it's not that badly applied. Of course, everything is relative, and this is still a cheap coating, but I have seen much worse.

Diamond Head DU-150 Soprano Ukulele body

Under that coating is a body they specify as being made from maple. Maple it may be, but it's still laminate, and a thick laminate at that. That's immediately noticeable by the weight and a glance at the edge of the soundhole. I could also get annoyed by the fact that there product descriptions say things like 'maple body' and not 'laminate maple body' (and it does annoy me), but that is now happening SO much with brands I'm tired of moaning about it. It's impossible to say if the top is a single sheet or two pieces due to the coating and ditto on the sides. I suspect that they are all single pieces. The back is dead flat too.

Diamond Head DU-150 Soprano Ukulele back

We have as similar bridge on this one as on the Ashton insofar as it is impossible to say what wood it is as it's painted black. It's a tie bar style bridge screwed in place, but actually, apart from it being painted, it's much tidier than the Ashton. Fitted into this is a plastic uncompensated saddle.

Diamond Head DU-150 Soprano Ukulele bridge

We have no other decoration on this one safe for a soundhole rosette transfer in gold. At least they applied it in the right place!

Inside things look pretty dull and messy. We do have kerfing linings this time, but they are un-notched - just strips of bent wood. There are also a ton of shavings /mess knocking about plus a label with a suitably Hawaiian theme (yawn...). And like so many other cheap laminate instruments there is no bracing on this one.

The neck is specified as being maple, but you wouldn't know because it's covered in the same paint which also makes it impossible for me to see how many pieces it's made from. Topping this is what they call an 'ebonized hardwood' fingerboard. That must be one of the worst forms of marketing speak I have ever  heard. The hardwood bit may be correct, but in this case ebonized means 'painted black'...  Ebonized indeed...   "I see a red door and I want to ebonize it black..."   (** note - Ebonizing wood IS actually a chemical reaction to turn it black - this is painted..)

Unlike the Ashton though, it's actually painted relatively neatly and at first glance you wouldn't know it was paint. Still, I'd prefer an actual dark wood myself, and you can get them at this price. The neck is a generic 34mm wide at the nut and the profile quite slight.

Diamond Head DU-150 Soprano Ukulele fingerboard

It's fitted with a fairly standard 12 nickel silver frets, and they are actually all dressed very well. No sharp edges here at all and the fret ends are hidden by black paint too. Some of the upper frets though appear a bit corroded. We have plastic inlaid position markers facing out at the 5th, 7th and 10th spaces and these are repeated with dots on the side.

Past the plastic nut which is glued in place roughly (glue seeping out of the side) and does suffer from being sharp on the edges, we have a generic three pointed crown headstock. Screen printed on this is the Diamond Head logo in gold which I think is pretty awful. It reminds me of lettering from a cheap 1950's cartoon and just looks cheap.

Diamond Head DU-150 Soprano Ukulele headstock

Fitted to the headstock are generic, open geared tuners with chrome hardware and overly large white plastic buttons. Exactly what I expected for the price, but at least they have no play or wobble in them, don't grind and work. Yet that is academic, as being a soprano, I would prefer friction pegs anyway - these look like massive ears. Why oh why oh why etc...

Diamond Head DU-150 Soprano Ukulele tuners

Finishing off we have a gig bag that makes the one that came with the Ashton look high quality. It's kind of like the material used to make the flysheet of cheap tents and utterly, utterly pointless. You also get a set of generic clear nylon strings which are horrible and the sort I had hoped we had seen the back of in the ukulele world. The slippery, flabby sort that just seem to have no life in them whatsoever.  For this you will also pay a little more than the Ashton at about £33. That's putting it more 'head to head' with a Makala Dolphin (which you can pick up for only a little bit more) and more than the excellent Octopus Soprano which you can grab for about £25. So this is still a cheap uke, but at this end of the scale every little helps.

In the hands it feels much nicer than the Ashton as it doesn't have a finish that feels like it will rub off on your palms and leave you stained. There's a weird positive.. As I say above, the neck is comfortable too on account of there being no sharp edges.  It's actually pleasant. It is a heavy ukulele though for its size, although not as heavy as the Ashton. It's well balanced too. Good things I suppose.

Set up on this...well, it needs a setup. Badly. The action at the nut and saddle are both far too high, and whilst you are setting it up I would take the time to swap those strings too as they are frankly dreadful. Now I could say that for the Ashton too, but the point here is twofold. I always review ukuleles with stock strings, and you need to then consider IF the instrument is worth upgrading the strings. In other words - would the cost of new strings purely to improve it be worth it?  With the Ashton there was no point I thought as the build was flawed in too many ways.

And because of these strings I'm finding it hard to be too positive about this one. Naturally they give it a very one dimensional plinky plonky 'dead' sound. No matter how I play it, it's just not enjoyable in tone. Perhaps (and it's a very minor 'perhaps' that is clutching at every straw in the box), fingerpicking is a little better, but really it's all just a bit flat. One thing that IS obvious about this though is that the body does have a fair amount of resonance to it. Just rapping it with the knuckles tells me that and that leads me to believe that there may be more in this ukulele with the right treatment and setup. In fact you can sense it even with these strings as it has much more sustain than something like the Ashton. Perhaps there is something in it.

The intonation is 'reasonably' good too, though would be improved further by attending to the nut and saddle action. I've seen worse out of the box on some much more expensive instruments though. So it's leaving me not totally depressed and wanting to smash it, so that's something I suppose. As a very well known ukulele festival Director friend of mine would say, "It does not totally suck".

Yet let's put things back into perspective - despite me trying to be pleased this is not a great ukulele, and in the scheme of things and you can do much better for the price. I have absolutely no doubt that a setup and string change would turn this into a different intstrument altogether.  But I don't want that to come across as a recommendation or validation.  My issue with it lies mainly with that price. For a little more money you can get the extremely reputable Dolphin, or for less the excellent Octopus which already comes with much better strings and a much nicer neck and fingerboard. Adding a pack of Aquila strings into your basket on this one makes the bill come in at £40 plus and then I'm just thinking 'why would you?'

Close, but no cigar I am afraid.


Generally reasonably put together for the price
Well dressed fret ends
Reasonably resonant body
Tuners that dont grind


Untidy build inside
Painted bridge and fingerboard
TERRIBLE strings let the whole thing down
Some cruddy upper frets
Big eared tuners
Utterly pointless bag


Looks - 7 out of 10
Fit and finish - 6 out of 10
Sound - 5 out of 10
Value for money - 6 out of 10






  1. Timing's so important - follow behind a real stinker and the reference point changes! Wonder if your score would have moved down a few points if you hadn't just reviewed the Ashton.

    I've seen this one advertised a lot, so I was mildly curious, but your review is pretty much what I expected.

  2. I just saw that you had posted this review and decided to take a look since earlier this year I bought three of these for my kids. To answer your question of "why would you?" I say because my kids fell in love with their favorite colors from the rainbow of options available and begged to have them. Now I'm a hero, albeit a hero who now has the privilege of listening to kids playing cheap ukuleles. I did pick up some Aquila strings to try out on them, but haven't mounted them yet. Maybe I'll update you after we make the switch. Your review is spot on about the nylon strings and the plinky sound. The strings are slippery - which is actually why I've left them on. They are far more gentle on my kids' fingers while they are learning and improving their strumming technique, while the grippier Aquilas rub blisters quickly. I was fortunate enough to pick up each instrument for $30. I don't think I would have bought them at the price point you described. I bought them as toys for each kid to "earn" by learning to play C, G, and D7 chords with a promise to get them nicer instruments once they learn to play a song or two. Meanwhile they are content to play their hand selected treasures and don't hesitate to show off for family and friends. I suppose I could have started out with nicer instruments, but I take comfort in knowing that I won't feel bad if one of these gets smashed.

  3. I got one of these as a present a while back. The factory strings are terrible as stated in the review. Very thick and somehow felt "edgy". I changed those to some GHS strings I happened to find in a general store and the sound improved a lot. Absolutely worth it! Prior the change it stopped ringing on at 5th fret, now it plays nicely up to 9th. I suppose investing more on the strings probably does not bring anymore out of this instrument.

    Other than that I have very little to add to the review. Cheap ukulele, but I've had lots of fun with it. In the end, I've seen worse. This one is actually playable :)

  4. I got one of these for nothing when it was abandoned where I work. The terrible gig bag was not present so I can't comment on that but the strings definitely leave much to be desired. It will be my work uke when we return to regular business, albeit with different strings.


Please leave me a comment!

Help Support Got A Ukulele

Please Help Keep This Site Going!

If you enjoy this blog, donations are welcomed to allow me to invest more time in bringing you ukulele articles. Aside from the Google ads, I don't get paid to write this blog and for reasons of impartiality a not sponsored by brands or stores. Your donations all go back into the site to allow me to keep bringing you reviews, and in the end the ukuleles acquired are given to local schools and charities.